Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 45(8): 551-565, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37341675

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to update the previously published 2016 best-practice recommendations for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical low back pain (LBP) in the United States. METHODS: Two experienced health librarians conducted the literature searches for clinical practice guidelines and other relevant literature, and the investigators performed quality assessment of included studies. PubMed was searched from March 2015 to September 2021. A steering committee of 10 experts in chiropractic research, education, and practice used the most current relevant guidelines and publications to update care recommendations. A panel of 69 experts used a modified Delphi process to rate the recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 14 clinical practice guidelines, 10 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (all high quality). Sixty-nine members of the panel rated 38 recommendations. All but 1 statement achieved consensus in the first round, and the final statement reached consensus in the second round. Recommendations covered the clinical encounter from history, physical examination, and diagnostic considerations through informed consent, co-management, and treatment considerations for patients with mechanical LBP. CONCLUSION: This paper updates a previously published best-practice document for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical LBP.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Manipulación Quiropráctica , Adulto , Humanos , Consenso , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Examen Físico , Estados Unidos
2.
J Altern Complement Med ; 27(10): 850-867, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34314609

RESUMEN

Objective: To develop evidence-based recommendations on best practices for delivery of clinical preventive services by chiropractors and to offer practical resources to empower provider applications in practice. Design: Clinical practice guideline based on evidence-based recommendations of a panel of practitioners and experts on clinical preventive services. Methods: Synthesizing the results of a literature search for relevant clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews, a multidisciplinary steering committee with training and experience in health promotion, clinical prevention, and/or evidence-based chiropractic practice drafted a set of recommendations. A Delphi panel of experienced practitioners and faculty, primarily but not exclusively chiropractors, rated the recommendations by using the formal consensus methodology established by the RAND Corporation/University of California. Results: The Delphi consensus process was conducted during January-February 2021. The 65-member Delphi panel reached a high level of consensus on appropriate application of clinical preventive services for screening and health promotion counseling within the chiropractic scope of practice. Interprofessional collaboration for the successful delivery of clinical preventive services was emphasized. Recommendations were made on primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary prevention of musculoskeletal pain. Conclusions: Application of this guideline in chiropractic practice may facilitate consistent and appropriate use of screening and preventive services and foster interprofessional collaboration to promote clinical preventive services and contribute to improved public health.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Manipulación Quiropráctica , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Adulto , Consenso , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
3.
J Altern Complement Med ; 26(10): 884-901, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32749874

RESUMEN

Objective: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) through a broad-based consensus process on best practices for chiropractic management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Design: CPG based on evidence-based recommendations of a panel of experts in chronic MSK pain management. Methods: Using systematic reviews identified in an initial literature search, a steering committee of experts in research and management of patients with chronic MSK pain drafted a set of recommendations. Additional supportive literature was identified to supplement gaps in the evidence base. A multidisciplinary panel of experienced practitioners and educators rated the recommendations through a formal Delphi consensus process using the RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles, methodology. Results: The Delphi process was conducted January-February 2020. The 62-member Delphi panel reached consensus on chiropractic management of five common chronic MSK pain conditions: low-back pain (LBP), neck pain, tension headache, osteoarthritis (knee and hip), and fibromyalgia. Recommendations were made for nonpharmacological treatments, including acupuncture, spinal manipulation/mobilization, and other manual therapy; modalities such as low-level laser and interferential current; exercise, including yoga; mind-body interventions, including mindfulness meditation and cognitive behavior therapy; and lifestyle modifications such as diet and tobacco cessation. Recommendations covered many aspects of the clinical encounter, from informed consent through diagnosis, assessment, treatment planning and implementation, and concurrent management and referral. Appropriate referral and comanagement were emphasized. Conclusions: These evidence-based recommendations for a variety of conservative treatment approaches to the management of common chronic MSK pain conditions may advance consistency of care, foster collaboration between provider groups, and thereby improve patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Manipulación Quiropráctica/normas , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Quiropráctica/normas , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Dolor de Cuello/terapia
4.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(9): 635-650, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870638

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop best-practice recommendations for chiropractic management of adults with neck pain. METHODS: A steering committee of experts in chiropractic practice, education, and research drafted a set of recommendations based on the most current relevant clinical practice guidelines. Additional supportive literature was identified through targeted searches conducted by a health sciences librarian. A national panel of chiropractors representing expertise in practice, research, and teaching rated the recommendations using a modified Delphi process. The consensus process was conducted from August to November 2018. Fifty-six panelists rated the 50 statements and concepts and reached consensus on all statements within 3 rounds. RESULTS: The statements and concepts covered aspects of the clinical encounter, ranging from informed consent through diagnosis, assessment, treatment planning and implementation, and concurrent management and referral for patients presenting with neck pain. CONCLUSIONS: These best-practice recommendations for chiropractic management of adults with neck pain are based on the best available scientific evidence. For uncomplicated neck pain, including neck pain with headache or radicular symptoms, chiropractic manipulation and multimodal care are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica/normas , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Manipulación Quiropráctica/normas , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Adulto , Consenso , Cefalea/terapia , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...